Source
Department for Transport — Local road maintenance ratings 2025 to 2026
amberOverall|amber Conditiongreen Spendamber Best Practice
Croydon: 43.6% of Residential Roads in RED — Last Measured in 2022
Croydon earns GREEN for spend — investing up to £13.1m a year against DfT allocations as low as £382k. But the overall DfT rating is AMBER, partly because B, C and U-road condition data is stale: when last surveyed, 43.6% of the borough's unclassified roads were in major deterioration — on a network where 594.1km of residential streets make up 82% of all carriageways.
43.6%
U-roads in RED condition (2022/23 survey)
Plus 39.9% Amber on 594.1km of residential and minor roads — surveyed on a three-year cycle, with the next survey due in summer 2025.
A 727km Network — Mostly Residential
Croydon's own highway inventory from the June 2025 transparency report
726.9 km
Total carriageways
51.6 km
A-roads (7.1%)
81.2 km
B/C roads (11.2%)
594.1 km
U-roads (81.7%)
Section 41 — The Duty
Croydon states it has "a legal requirement to maintain public highways under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980." A-roads carry traffic to Brighton and the South-East; B and C roads link those routes to the residential network that makes up most of the borough.
DfT Incomplete Data Flag
The DfT explicitly notes Croydon's overall, condition and best-practice scorecards are "based on incomplete road condition data." That is not our characterisation — it is the government's own caveat on this borough's ratings.
What The Condition Data Shows
A-roads surveyed annually via LoHEG; B, C and U roads last measured in 2022 on a three-year cycle
A-roads (51.6km — 7.1% of network): improving, council says
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | 49.0% | 45.3% | 38.2% |
| 2023/24 | 26.4% | 26.1% | 21.8% |
| 2024/25 | 24.6% | 28.6% | 40.0% |
Principal roads are surveyed yearly through AI-driven LoHEG/BPRN surveys. The council reports the overall condition is "improving year on year," with a long-term target to reduce BPRN roads in RED by 4%.
"The overall condition is improving year on year, but more investment is needed to achieve our long-term target as set out in our Highways Asset Management Strategy which details a target reduction of 4% of the borough principal road network (BPRN) in major deterioration (red) – longer term."
— Croydon Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
B and C roads (81.2km — 11.2% of network): 2022/23 snapshot only
18.0%
RED
24.1%
Amber
42.1%
Green
B and C roads were last surveyed in 2022, on a three-year frequency. No updated condition figures appear in the 2025 report — surveys were planned for summer 2025.
U-roads (594.1km — 81.7% of network): the claim hotspot
43.6%
RED
39.9%
Amber
32.3%
Green
When last measured in 2022/23, more than four in ten Croydon residential roads were in RED condition — major deterioration requiring maintenance consideration. That figure is three years old.
"Classified non-principal (B&C) and unclassified (U) roads have been last surveyed in 2022, with a frequency of 3 years. The data was collected via a driven-conditioned (artificial intelligence) survey, and road condition categorised using a slightly different AI model to that used on the borough principal road network (BPRN)."
— Croydon Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
The Three-Year Local-Road Blind Spot
82% of Croydon's carriageways run on a survey cycle the 2025 report has not yet updated
"Surveys are being carried out in the summer of 2025, which will give decision-makers a better picture of the evolution of road condition since the last survey, and how the treatments undertaken have performed against the expected network deterioration."
— Croydon Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
Inspection vs Condition Survey
Croydon assigns every road a network hierarchy that determines safety inspection frequency — busier roads inspected more often, quieter streets less so. But condition surveys for B, C and U roads run every three years, using a different AI model to the principal road network.
A safety inspection regime is not the same as knowing network-wide condition. For Section 58, ask whether the council had reasonable knowledge of deterioration on your specific road — not just whether an inspector drove past on schedule.
Response Time Targets
Reactive jobs are raised through a digital asset management system with priority levels by defect severity. The council states:
"a severe pothole is marked for urgent works to be repaired within 24 hours, whereas a fine crack appearing on the road surface could be marked for repair within the next month."
Why This Matters For Section 58
To rely on the Section 58 defence, Croydon must show a reasonable system for knowing and fixing defects. For the borough's U-road network, ask:
- • When was your road last condition-surveyed — and was that before or after the 2022 snapshot?
- • If 43.6% of U-roads were RED at the last survey, what was done about yours specifically?
- • Does a three-year survey cycle provide reasonable knowledge on a network filling ~3,000 potholes a year?
- • Can the council prove your defect was inspected, classified and repaired within its own response targets?
Stale condition data on 594.1km of residential roads is not a strong foundation for rejecting every pothole claim with a generic "adequate system" letter.
GREEN Spend — But Patching Over Localised Failures
Croydon invests heavily in highways — the DfT Spend scorecard reflects that. The question is whether it matches where defects actually form.
| Year | DfT capital (£k) | Capital spend (£k) | Revenue (£k) | Preventative | Reactive | Resurfaced (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | — | 6,693 | 266 | 73% | 27% | 11.7 |
| 2021/22 | — | 10,077 | 338 | 73% | 27% | 45.2 |
| 2022/23 | — | 13,150 | 692 | 80% | 20% | 32.6 |
| 2023/24 | 382 | 9,940 | 1,184 | 73% | 27% | 15.7 |
| 2024/25 | 382 | 12,555 | 1,747 | 82% | 18% | 15.8 |
| 2025/26 (proj.) | 1,241 | 11,500 | 949 | 81% | 19% | 24.5 |
"For the past few years, our budget allocated for highways maintenance has varied over the last five years (up to £13.1M), with a varying type of treatment being undertaken over the last year, especially, to allow the budget to cover more kilometres of the road network. And as such, more partial resurfacing and patching programmes were carried out to address localised issues."
— Croydon Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
The Well-Funded, Still-Amber Paradox
£382k
DfT capital allocation 2024/25
£12.6m
Actual capital spend 2024/25
82%
Preventative share 2024/25
Croydon spends roughly 33 times its DfT capital allocation from its own capital programme — and still carries an AMBER condition rating with stale local-road survey data. Money is not the whole story; knowing where defects are forming is.
~15,000 Potholes in Five Years
Reactive repair volume tells you how many defects this network still produces
| Year | Potholes filled (estimate) |
|---|---|
| 2021/22 | 3,113 |
| 2022/23 | 2,939 |
| 2023/24 | 3,718 |
| 2024/25 | 3,140 |
| Five-year total (report estimate) | ~15,000 |
"We aim to keep our network safe by reacting as fast as possible to potholes and other defects endangering the public and their properties. In the last 5 years, we have filled around 15,000 potholes, with an average of 3,000 potholes per year as seen in Table 2. We aim to reduce this number by being more proactive and increasing our planned maintenance works, to avoid expensive reactive maintenance. We expect to fill in around 2,000-3,000 potholes this year, showing a reduction on average to previous years observed."
— Croydon Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
~8 Potholes Every Day
At roughly 3,000 pothole repairs per year, Croydon fills around eight defects every day — on a network where 43.6% of U-roads were already in RED condition at the last survey. That is a network producing defects faster than three-year condition monitoring can track.
2025/26 Forward Plan
The council plans 71 roads for planned maintenance in 2025/26, around 20km of carriageway resurfacing and significant crack sealing — techniques ranging from crack sealing on Addington Road to 40mm resurfacing on Grant Road. That is proactive work, but it covers a fraction of 726.9km.
How Croydon Prioritises Repairs
Asset management strategy, inspection hierarchy, and the 2025/26 works programme
"We plan maintenance works using a priority list that takes into account the condition of the road, its hierarchy, the reactive jobs recently completed, and any public claims or enquiries. The list is then refined considering local context and efficiencies to create a practical and balanced works programme."
— Croydon Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
Survey Methodology
- • A-roads: annual LoHEG AI-driven condition surveys (BPRN)
- • B/C and U roads: AI-driven surveys every three years (last: 2022)
- • Footways: driven video AI survey every three years (PAS 2161 from 2026/27)
- • RAG categories: Green (no treatment), Amber (maintenance soon), Red (maintenance should be considered)
Asset Value Context (Annex B)
Croydon's indicative gross replacement cost for the entire highway network at end of 2024/25 is £2.16bn, with carriageways alone at £1.18bn. Maintenance spend represented 0.58% of asset value in 2024/25.
The council updated its Highways Asset Management Strategy in 2024 and tracks performance through nine contractor KPIs including emergency callout response times.
Public Claims Feed The Priority List
Croydon explicitly includes "public claims or enquiries" in its maintenance prioritisation. That cuts both ways:
- • A prior report on FixMyStreet or Love Clean Streets may prove the council had notice before your incident
- • If your claim was logged but the road was not treated, that weakens any "unknown defect" argument
- • The council engages residents, ward councillors and community groups when setting priorities — documented complaints matter
Specificity wins: date-stamped photos, prior reports, and the road's place in Croydon's hierarchy are more persuasive than arguing the council "doesn't spend enough."
Claiming Against a GREEN-Spend AMBER Council
Honest assessment: Croydon is not a spend-starved authority — here is how that changes your approach
What Works In The Council's Favour
- ✓ GREEN spend — capital investment up to £13.1m, far exceeding DfT allocation
- ✓ 73–82% preventative spending across the five-year table
- ✓ AMBER best practice — documented HAMS, contractor KPIs, ISO-aligned processes via FM Conway
- ✓ A-road condition reported as improving year on year
- ✓ 24-hour target for severe potholes — a concrete response standard they can point to
Expect a structured Section 58 defence citing spend levels and inspection regimes. Generic "the roads are terrible" claims will struggle.
What Works In Yours
- ✗ AMBER condition — DfT flags incomplete local-road condition data
- ✗ 43.6% of U-roads in RED at the last 2022/23 survey on 594.1km of residential network
- ✗ B/C/U roads not re-surveyed since 2022 — three-year gap before summer 2025 programme
- ✗ ~15,000 potholes filled in five years — defects still forming despite heavy spend
- ✗ Council admits "more partial resurfacing and patching" to stretch budget over more kilometres
The Winning Strategy Here Is Specificity
Against a council with GREEN spend and documented asset management, your claim lives or dies on the specific defect:
- • Prior reports of the same pothole (FixMyStreet, Love Clean Streets, council enquiries) — proof of actual notice
- • Photos showing defect size, depth and visible age (weathered edges, previous patching)
- • Road class — on a U-road, the 2022 survey data and three-year cycle gap are your strongest structural arguments
- • Whether the council met its own 24-hour severe-pothole target for your location
Mac builds exactly this case: he searches for prior reports, assesses your photo evidence, and cites Croydon's own transparency data where it helps you.
Hit a Pothole in Croydon?
A well-funded council demands a well-built claim. £35 for a professional claim pack.
DIY Claim
- • Submit photos and invoices
- • Use generic template letter
- • No U-road 43.6% RED argument
- • No prior-report search
- • No three-year survey-gap analysis
Professional Claim Pack
- ✅ 43.6% U-road RED condition cited from council data
- ✅ Three-year local-road survey gap argued
- ✅ ~15,000 potholes in five years contextualised
- ✅ Prior reports searched and attached
- ✅ Section 58 rebuttal tailored to Croydon
No percentage fees. You keep 100% of any compensation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Croydon has a GREEN spend rating — can I still claim for pothole damage?
Yes. The DfT Spend scorecard is GREEN because Croydon invests well beyond its DfT capital allocation — £12.6m capital spend against a £382k DfT allocation in 2024/25. But your claim turns on whether the specific defect was reasonably inspected and repaired under Section 58, not on aggregate spend. The Condition scorecard is AMBER, and 43.6% of U-roads were in RED condition the last time they were surveyed.
What if my pothole was on a residential or unclassified road?
U-roads make up 594.1km — 82% of Croydon's 726.9km carriageway network. The council's own 2022/23 survey found 43.6% of U-roads in RED (major deterioration) and 39.9% in Amber. B and C roads were last surveyed in 2022 on a three-year cycle, with new surveys planned for summer 2025. If your incident falls in the gap, the council's own condition picture for your road type may be years out of date.
Why does the DfT flag Croydon's condition data as incomplete?
The DfT notes that Croydon's overall, condition and best-practice scorecards are "based on incomplete road condition data." The council's transparency report confirms B, C and U roads were last surveyed in 2022, while A-roads are surveyed annually via LoHEG. That gap in local-road condition reporting is exactly the sort of weakness that undermines a blanket Section 58 defence on residential streets.
Does Croydon's 24-hour pothole response target help the council reject my claim?
It helps them only if they can prove your defect was inspected, classified correctly, and either repaired within 24 hours (for severe potholes) or scheduled within their hierarchy-based timeframe. The council's own report states a severe pothole is marked for urgent repair within 24 hours, but also that it still fills around 3,000 potholes per year — evidence that defects continue to form and require reactive repair despite preventative spending at 82%.
Croydon says A-road condition is improving — does that weaken claims on main roads?
A-roads are a small share of the network — 51.6km of 726.9km total. The council acknowledges principal roads are "improving year on year" but still need "more investment" to hit a long-term target of reducing BPRN roads in RED by 4%. Even on A-roads, your claim still turns on whether the specific defect was known, inspected and treated in time — not on a borough-wide trend line.
Data sources: Department for Transport — Local Road Maintenance Ratings 2025 to 2026 | Croydon Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report (June 2025). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Reusable evidence record
Council rating evidence and provenance
Rating period: 2025-2026 · Reviewed 19 July 2026
Observed DfT fact
Overall AMBER; condition AMBER; spend GREEN; best practice AMBER.
Cautious interpretation
This is network-level context. The rating does not determine liability for a particular incident or establish what was known about a specific defect.
Correction status: No correction recorded.