Source
Department for Transport — Local road maintenance ratings 2025 to 2026
amberOverall|amber Conditiongreen Spendamber Best Practice
Ealing Needs £8.5m Just to Stand Still — and Admits the Network Will Decline
Ealing Council's own consultant calculated a £8.5m minimum annual budget to hold road condition steady — then warned that without it, the network will continue to decline. The DfT gives GREEN for spend, but the overall rating is AMBER because 9% of 490km of residential streets remain in RED condition while projected 2025/26 maintenance spend falls roughly £840,000 short of that steady-state figure.
490km
Unclassified roads — 82% of the borough
9% in RED condition at the 2024 survey — approximately 44km of residential streets, estate roads and local routes across Acton, Ealing, Greenford, Hanwell, Northolt, Perivale and Southall.
What The Condition Data Shows
Five years of survey data from Ealing's own transparency report — A-roads improving, B/C roads flat, residential streets stuck at 9-10% RED
Ealing's 597km road network
81km
A-roads
14% of network
26km
B and C roads
4% of network
490km
U-roads
82% of network
985km
Footways
also maintained
The borough also maintains 7km of segregated cycleways, 82km of public rights of way (estimated), 12 road bridges, 15 footbridges, 6 subways and approximately 27,680 gullies cleaned on a reactive basis.
A-roads (81km — 14% of network): improving
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 7% | 20% | 73% |
| 2021 | No data collected | ||
| 2022 | 5% | 18% | 77% |
| 2023 | 5% | 14% | 81% |
| 2024 | 3% | 19% | 78% |
Principal road data is collected annually on behalf of Ealing by Transport for London. Credit where due: RED-condition A-roads have more than halved since 2020. But A-roads are only one-seventh of the borough's road network.
B and C roads (26km — 4% of network): broadly flat
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 10% | 29% | 61% |
| 2021 | No data collected | ||
| 2022 | 7% | 28% | 65% |
| 2023 | 8% | 28% | 64% |
| 2024 | 9% | 26% | 65% |
B and C road condition has barely moved: RED share was 10% in 2020 and 9% in 2024. Combined with amber-rated roads, roughly 35% of the classified local network needs — or will soon need — maintenance.
GREEN Spend — But Below Steady-State
£945k
DfT capital allocation 2025/26
£5.65m
Projected capital spend 2025/26
73.7%
Estimated preventative share
Ealing spends nearly six times its DfT capital allocation — earning a GREEN spend scorecard. But projected 2025/26 capital and revenue spend totals roughly £7.66m, still below the council's own £8.5m steady-state minimum. The chequebook is open; the network is still underfunded on the council's own model.
The 490km Residential Majority
82% of Ealing's roads are unclassified — surveyed annually by walked inspection
| Year | U-roads in RED condition |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 10% |
| 2021 | No data collected |
| 2022 | 10% |
| 2023 | 9% |
| 2024 | 9% |
Walked DVI Surveys
Ealing collects unclassified road condition data annually through Detailed Visual Inspection surveys — a walked inspection by an independent surveyor identifying defects and scoring sections against the UK Pavement Management System standard.
Classified B and C roads are assessed using SCANNER laser-based technology. A-road condition is collected annually by TfL. There is no condition data at all for any road class in 2021.
"Remaining Constant" — At 9-10% RED
The council's own analysis states the unclassified road trend is "remaining constant" — but simultaneously admits inflation has "significantly impacted" budgets in real terms, with population growth and new developments increasing demand on the network.
At 9% RED, roughly 44km of residential streets should be considered for maintenance. That is not a network in recovery — it is one treading water.
Why This Matters For Section 58
To rely on the Section 58 defence, a council must show it had a reasonable system for knowing the condition of its roads. For Ealing's unclassified network, ask:
- • When was your street last DVI-surveyed — and what condition score did it receive?
- • If 9% of U-roads are RED borough-wide, what was done about the defect on your road?
- • Did the council's walked survey identify your pothole before it damaged your vehicle?
- • With budgets below the £8.5m steady-state minimum, how quickly are RED-category streets scheduled?
A council that admits its network will decline without £8.5m a year cannot claim comprehensive knowledge of every defect on 490km of residential roads.
17,297 Potholes in Five Years
Reactive repair volumes from Ealing's transparency report — down in the latest year, not gone
| Year | Potholes filled |
|---|---|
| 2020/21 | 3,241 |
| 2021/22 | 3,900 |
| 2022/23 | 2,888 |
| 2023/24 | 4,241 |
| 2024/25 | 3,027 |
| Five-year total | 17,297 |
~9.5 Potholes a Day, Every Day
Averaged over five years, Ealing fills around 9.5 potholes per day across its 597km network. For 2025/26 the council estimates an average of 3,500 pothole repairs plus 500 additional pre-emptive locations that would not normally meet safety intervention levels — defects caught before they become reportable, but still evidence of a network generating failures.
The 2024/25 Drop Is Not Recovery
Pothole fills fell from 4,241 to 3,027 in 2024/25 — a 29% reduction. That reflects repair volumes, not road quality. With 9% of U-roads still RED and the council projecting 3,500 repairs for 2025/26, the network is still producing defects faster than preventative resurfacing can eliminate the underlying problem.
What Ealing Admits In Its Own Words
Verbatim quotes from the July 2025 transparency report
"Based on modelling carried out in 2021 by an independent consultant, it was calculated that a minimum annual budget of £8.5m is required to maintain the network in a steady state at its current condition. Without this level of budget, the road network will continue to decline. We have not received any funding for Principal Road renewal from TfL in two years, therefore the additional DfT pothole funding is vital as we tend to use it to resurface our busiest roads and junctions."
— Ealing Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
"The trend indicated the unclassified roads is remaining constant based on the condition rating scores. However, inflation has significantly impacted upon our budgets in real terms and funding is increasingly stretched, with there being further implications in terms of population growth and substantial new developments, increasing demand for the network. The change to electric vehicles also increases the burden on the network, with heavier electric buses for example. The road network was not designed and built for such types."
— Ealing Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
The TfL Funding Gap
Ealing has received no TfL principal road renewal funding for two years. DfT pothole grants — rising from £291,000 to a projected £945,000 in 2025/26 — are now "vital" for resurfacing the borough's busiest roads and junctions.
That creates a documented dependency: main-road resurfacing relies on ring-fenced pothole pots, not steady principal renewal funding. A defect on a busy route may sit longer than the headline A-road improvement figures suggest.
A Network Not Built For Today
Ealing explicitly states its roads "were not designed and built" for heavier electric buses and modern traffic loads. Combined with climate pressures — hotter temperatures, wetter conditions, cold snaps — the council documents structural reasons defects keep forming.
That is not an excuse for individual potholes. It is an admission the network faces elevated deterioration risk — which raises what a "reasonable" inspection regime must deliver.
Five Years of Maintenance Spending
Capital and revenue figures from Table 2 — preventative share rising, reactive share still a quarter
| Year | DfT capital allocation | Capital spend | Revenue spend | Preventative | Reactive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | — | £4,249,416 | £1,998,815 | 68.0% | 32.0% |
| 2021/22 | — | £4,811,041 | £2,013,737 | 70.5% | 29.5% |
| 2022/23 | — | £5,176,423 | £1,947,096 | 72.6% | 27.4% |
| 2023/24 | £291,000 | £4,850,551 | £2,124,040 | 69.5% | 30.5% |
| 2024/25 | £291,000 | £5,566,168 | £2,160,508 | 72.0% | 28.0% |
| 2025/26 (projected) | £945,000 | £5,647,512 | £2,012,240 | 73.7% | 26.3% |
2025/26 Forward Plans
DfT funding will be split with £500,000 for the borough-wide drive-and-repair pothole programme and £450,000 for plane-and-lay resurfacing. Planned resurfacing locations include Greenford Road, Uxbridge Road, Argyle Road, Rockware Avenue and Tentelow Lane. The council will resurface approximately 0.5km of carriageway under this programme.
0.5km of resurfacing against a 597km network puts the scale of the challenge in perspective — even with GREEN-rated spend, physical renewal reaches only a fraction of the borough each year.
Claiming Against a GREEN-Spend, AMBER-Condition Council
Honest assessment: Ealing invests seriously — but admits it is still not enough
What Works In The Council's Favour
- ✓ GREEN spend scorecard — capital spend nearly six times the DfT allocation
- ✓ 73.7% of projected spend classed as preventative maintenance
- ✓ A-road RED condition halved since 2020 (7% to 3%)
- ✓ Annual condition surveys on all road classes (DVI for U-roads, SCANNER for B/C, TfL for A-roads)
- ✓ Drive-and-repair programme with pre-emptive intervention on emerging defects
Expect a documented Section 58 defence on well-maintained A-roads. Generic claims will struggle.
What Works In Yours
- ✗ AMBER condition — 9% of 490km of U-roads in RED, trend only "remaining constant"
- ✗ Council admits £8.5m steady-state minimum — projected spend ~£7.66m falls short
- ✗ No TfL principal road renewal funding for two years
- ✗ 17,297 potholes filled in five years — defects still forming across the network
- ✗ AMBER best practice — not the full GREEN profile of top-rated authorities
- ✗ Roads "not designed and built" for modern vehicle weights — documented deterioration risk
The Winning Strategy Here Is Specificity
Against a council with GREEN spend but AMBER condition, your claim lives or dies on the specific defect:
- • Prior reports of the same pothole (FixMyStreet, council reports) — proof of actual notice
- • Photos showing the defect's size, depth and visible age (weathered edges, previous patching)
- • The road's class — on a U-road, the 9% borough-wide RED rate and £8.5m funding gap are your structural arguments
- • Whether your road was on a 2025/26 drive-and-repair or resurfacing programme — or left out
Mac builds exactly this case: he searches for prior reports, assesses your photo evidence, and cites Ealing's own transparency data where it helps you.
Hit a Pothole in Ealing?
A well-funded council still demands a well-built claim. £35 for a professional claim pack.
DIY Claim
- • Submit photos and invoices
- • Use generic template letter
- • No £8.5m funding-gap argument
- • No prior-report search
- • No U-road condition data cited
Professional Claim Pack
- ✅ £8.5m steady-state admission cited
- ✅ 9% U-road RED condition documented
- ✅ 17,297 five-year pothole repairs referenced
- ✅ Prior reports searched and attached
- ✅ Section 58 rebuttal tailored to Ealing
No percentage fees. You keep 100% of any compensation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ealing has a GREEN spend scorecard — can I still claim?
Yes. The DfT Spend rating reflects that Ealing invests well beyond its £945,000 capital allocation. But your claim turns on the specific defect, not aggregate spend — and Ealing is AMBER on condition because B, C and unclassified roads are not improving. Section 58 requires proof the council reasonably knew about and repaired the pothole that damaged your vehicle.
What if my pothole was on a residential or unclassified road?
Unclassified roads make up 490km — 82% of Ealing's 597km road network. At the last survey in 2024, 9% of U-roads were in RED condition, roughly 44km of residential streets. The council collects U-road condition data annually via walked Detailed Visual Inspection surveys, but admits the trend is only "remaining constant" while budgets are stretched in real terms.
Does the £8.5m steady-state budget admission help my claim?
It can. Ealing's own transparency report states that a minimum annual budget of £8.5m is required to maintain the network at its current condition — and that without it, "the road network will continue to decline." Projected 2025/26 capital and revenue spend totals roughly £7.66m, below that threshold. That is a council admission it is underfunding maintenance relative to its own consultant's model.
A-roads are improving — does that weaken claims on main roads?
On principal routes, Ealing's position is stronger: RED-condition A-roads fell from 7% in 2020 to 3% in 2024, with TfL collecting data annually. But the council also admits it has received no TfL principal road renewal funding for two years, relying on DfT pothole grants for its busiest resurfacing. A claim on an A-road still depends on whether the specific defect was reasonably inspected and repaired.
Pothole repairs fell to 3,027 in 2024/25 — does that mean the roads are fixed?
No. Ealing filled 3,027 potholes in 2024/25, down from 4,241 the year before. Over five years the council repaired 17,297 potholes — about 9.5 every day. For 2025/26 it estimates an average of 3,500 pothole repairs plus 500 additional pre-emptive locations that would not normally meet safety intervention levels.
What does the AMBER best-practice rating mean for Section 58?
Ealing scores AMBER on best practice alongside AMBER on condition — not the full GREEN profile of better-rated authorities. The council does run preventative programmes (73.7% of projected 2025/26 spend) and annual condition surveys, but also documents inflation pressure, no TfL principal renewal funding for two years, and a network "not designed and built" for modern vehicle weights. Specificity — prior reports, photos, road class — matters more than the headline rating.
Data sources: Department for Transport — Local Road Maintenance Ratings 2025 to 2026 | Ealing Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report (July 2025). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Reusable evidence record
Council rating evidence and provenance
Rating period: 2025-2026 · Reviewed 19 July 2026
Observed DfT fact
Overall AMBER; condition AMBER; spend GREEN; best practice AMBER.
Cautious interpretation
This is network-level context. The rating does not determine liability for a particular incident or establish what was known about a specific defect.
Correction status: No correction recorded.