Source
Department for Transport — Local road maintenance ratings 2025 to 2026
Rochdale Borough Council spends above its DfT capital allocation and earns a GREEN spend scorecard. Yet the DfT rates its overall performance AMBER and its asset management approach RED — because the council's own transparency report reveals 71.77% of reactive spend went on pothole intervention in 2024/25, zero preventative maintenance in 2022/23, and a highways data system still being built "over the next few years."
The DfT's RED best-practice scorecard is the strongest claim-relevant signal in Rochdale's ratings — and the council's own report explains why
"We did not carry out any preventative maintenance in 2022/23 due to the highway service delivery returning in-house and had insufficient timescales to arrange a preventative treatment programme"
— Rochdale Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
"We will continue to build up our information data in relation to inventory & condition over the next few years to drive a data lead prioritisation of maintenance works across different assets."
— Rochdale Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
The DfT incentive fund scores best practice on asset management maturity — inventory completeness, preventative-first spending, reliable performance data, and alignment with Well-Managed Highway Infrastructure. A RED score means Rochdale falls short of national standards on these measures, regardless of how much it spends.
For Section 58, a council claiming a "reasonable system" of maintenance needs documented processes, consistent data, and planned intervention — not a programme that is still transitioning systems and building its asset inventory.
Rochdale recently purchased the Alloy works ordering and asset management system. It uses this to log assets, create works orders, and link to its CRM — but the council explicitly states it will take years to build complete inventory and condition data.
Pothole figures for 2022/23 are flagged as partial data due to the system change. A council still assembling its asset management foundation is a weaker Section 58 defendant than one with mature, continuous records.
An average of 65.19% of revenue spend over the last five years has gone on reactive maintenance — primarily pothole repairs and urgent defect fixes. The council aims to shift towards planned preventative work, but its own projected 2025/26 split is still 21.23% preventative (capital) against 70.00% reactive (revenue).
Five years of SCANNER and AEI survey data from Rochdale's own transparency report — AMBER overall because local roads are not holding steady
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4% | 23% | 73% |
| 2021 | 3% | 22% | 75% |
| 2022 | 4% | 23% | 73% |
| 2023 | 6% | 22% | 72% |
| 2024 | 4% | 21% | 75% |
A-road condition is broadly stable, with a spike to 6% RED in 2023. Surveys use a mixture of SCANNER and AEI data on an annual basis.
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5% | 24% | 71% |
| 2021 | 4% | 21% | 75% |
| 2022 | 4% | 23% | 74% |
| 2023 | 7% | 25% | 68% |
| 2024 | 5% | 24% | 71% |
B/C roads hit their worst point in 2023: 7% RED and only 68% GREEN — a third of the classified local road network needing or approaching maintenance. The 2024 figure improved to 5% RED, but nearly a third of B/C roads remain in amber condition.
| Year | U-roads in RED condition |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 17% |
| 2021 | 16% |
| 2022 | 17% |
| 2023 | 15% |
| 2024 | 12% |
At 12% RED in 2024, roughly 69km of Rochdale's residential and minor roads should be considered for maintenance. U-road condition is collected via the Annual Engineering Inspection programme, surveying 100% of the network each year.
"While AEI may indicate a higher proportion of the network in poor condition compared to SCANNER, this reflects its holistic, engineering-led evaluation of entire maintenance lengths."
— Rochdale Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
Rochdale's capital spend exceeds its DfT allocation — but the money is not buying a preventative-first programme
| Year | DfT allocation | Capital spend | Revenue spend | Preventative % | Reactive % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | £4,265k | £7,611k | £1,853k | 41.56% | 56.56% |
| 2021/22 | £4,121k | £5,106k | £2,000k | 14.59% | 59.78% |
| 2022/23 | £3,710k | £2,840k | £2,077k | 0.00% | 60.95% |
| 2023/24 | £4,641k | £7,734k | £2,245k | 12.92% | 76.89% |
| 2024/25 | £5,098k | £5,781k | £2,782k | 17.04% | 71.77% |
| 2025/26 (proj.) | £4,710k | £5,781k | £2,782k | 21.23% | 70.00% |
Rochdale consistently spends more capital than the DfT allocates — £5,781k against £4,710k projected for 2025/26, and £7,734k against £4,641k in 2023/24. Over five years, 49km of carriageway received preventative maintenance and 6.5km of footways were improved.
Preventative and reactive percentages are funded from separate budgets and do not add to 100%. In 2024/25, 71.77% of reactive spend went directly on pothole intervention — patching symptoms, not preventing them. The council itself says maintenance is "not solely determined by the result of these surveys" but by "local needs and priorities."
"The maintenance of roads is not solely determined by the result of these surveys. Other factors, based on local needs and priorities, will determine where maintenance is carried out to ensure the safety and longevity of the entire road network through a risk-based, highway asset management approach."
— Rochdale Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
The scale of reactive repair tells you how many defects this network produces
| Year | Potholes filled (estimate) | Carriageway resurfaced (km) | Carriageway preserved (km) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | 8,247 | 5.038 | 22.604 |
| 2021/22 | 8,679 | 5.622 | 7.666 |
| 2022/23 | 3,768* | 4.994 | 0.00 |
| 2023/24 | 8,091 | 12.515 | 7.643 |
| 2024/25 | 8,890 | 6.196 | 11.082 |
| Five-year total | 37,675 | 34.365 | 48.995 |
Averaged over five years, Rochdale fills roughly 21 potholes per day. The revenue programme also carries out approximately 5,500 carriageway repairs and 2,000 footway repairs annually, plus 45,905 gully cleans. That is a network producing defects faster than planned works can prevent them.
The council's own footnote: "part data due to change of works ordering system." That same year saw zero kilometres of carriageway preservation and 0.00% preventative maintenance spend. If your incident falls in this period, Rochdale's records are explicitly incomplete.
What Rochdale says it does to know the condition of its roads — and where the gaps are
Reported defects are prioritised for repair within 20 working days or logged for future consideration. The council's CRM system captures customer enquiries with dashboard reporting, and inspection teams log defects into Alloy with photographic evidence.
But the council also states road maintenance is not solely survey-driven — "other factors, based on local needs and priorities" determine where work happens. That discretion is exactly what prior reports and photos can challenge under Section 58.
Under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980, Rochdale must maintain its roads. Under Section 58, it can defend a claim only by proving a reasonable system of inspection and repair. For your specific defect, ask:
A council that admits its data is still being built, carried out zero preventative maintenance in 2022/23, and spends nearly three-quarters of its reactive budget patching potholes has a harder Section 58 argument than its GREEN spend scorecard suggests.
Honest assessment: Rochdale is not Derbyshire — here is how that changes your approach
Expect a structured Section 58 defence on well-surveyed A-roads. Generic claims will struggle.
Against a council with GREEN spend but RED best practice, your claim lives or dies on the specific defect:
Mac builds exactly this case: he searches for prior reports, assesses your photo evidence, and cites Rochdale's own transparency data — including the RED best-practice rating — where it helps you.
GREEN spend and RED best practice demand a precise claim. £35 for a professional claim pack.
No percentage fees. You keep 100% of any compensation.
Yes. The DfT Spend scorecard is GREEN because Rochdale's capital spend exceeds its allocation, but the overall rating is AMBER and best practice is RED. Section 58 turns on whether the specific defect that damaged your vehicle was reasonably inspected and repaired — not on aggregate spend. With 71.77% of reactive budget going directly to pothole intervention and only 17.04% of capital on preventative works in 2024/25, the council's own figures show a reactive-heavy programme.
The DfT has formally scored Rochdale's asset management approach as failing national best-practice standards. The council's own report admits zero preventative maintenance in 2022/23, incomplete pothole data that year due to a system change, and that inventory and condition data will take "the next few years" to build. That undermines a Section 58 defence based on a mature, data-led maintenance system.
U-roads make up 576.93km — 79% of Rochdale's 732.27km carriageway network. At the latest survey, 12% of U-roads were in RED condition, down from 17% in 2020 but still representing roughly 69km of residential streets, estate roads and minor routes. The council surveys U-roads annually via its Annual Engineering Inspection programme, but AEI may show higher poor-condition rates than SCANNER because it evaluates entire road sections rather than 10-metre sub-sections.
Not necessarily — 12% RED still means roughly one in eight U-roads should be considered for maintenance. The council also notes that AEI's holistic, engineering-led evaluation "may indicate a higher proportion of the network in poor condition compared to SCANNER." A declining percentage does not prove your specific defect was inspected or repaired within a reasonable timeframe.
Yes. Rochdale recorded only 3,768 pothole repairs in 2022/23 — less than half the surrounding years — and its own footnote states this is "part data due to change of works ordering system." That same year, the council carried out zero preventative maintenance after bringing highways delivery back in-house. If your incident falls in or around that period, the council's own records are incomplete.
Data sources: Department for Transport — Local Road Maintenance Ratings 2025 to 2026 | Rochdale Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report (June 2025). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Reusable evidence record
Rating period: 2025-2026 · Reviewed 19 July 2026
Department for Transport — Local road maintenance ratings 2025 to 2026
Overall AMBER; condition AMBER; spend GREEN; best practice RED.
This is network-level context. The rating does not determine liability for a particular incident or establish what was known about a specific defect.
Correction status: No correction recorded.