Source
Department for Transport — Local road maintenance ratings 2025 to 2026
greenOverall|green Conditiongreen Spendgreen Best Practice
Rotherham: All-GREEN, Still 15,936 Pothole Repairs
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council is one of the very few authorities in England rated GREEN on all four DfT scorecards — condition, spend, and best practice included. Their own transparency report still records 15,936 pothole repairs in 2024/25, a 775km unclassified network on a four-year visual survey cycle, and A-road RED condition edging up. GREEN is a network verdict. Your claim lives or dies on the specific defect and Section 58.
15,936
Estimated potholes filled in 2024/25
At an all-GREEN council managing 1,191km of roads — roughly 44 reactive repairs every day, despite 89.63% of maintenance spend classed as preventative.
The DfT's Verdict — All Four GREEN
| Scorecard | Performance | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | — | green |
| Condition | Above DfT threshold | green |
| A Roads | 85.5% good (vs ~69% national) | green |
| B & C Roads | 86.5% good (vs ~62% national) | green |
| Unclassified Roads | 69.5% good (DfT dataset) | green |
| Spend | ~90% preventative maintenance | green |
| Best Practice | Asset management aligned | green |
What all-GREEN means: Rotherham is performing above average on every DfT scorecard — one of a handful of councils in England to achieve that. Their A-roads sit 16 percentage points above the national average; B&C roads 24 points above. That reflects genuine investment: £51m in dedicated unclassified-road capital since 2015, with a further £12m commitment from 2024/25.
Context for your claim: GREEN measures network-level performance against other councils — not whether the specific pothole that damaged your vehicle was reasonably inspected and repaired. Rotherham still filled an estimated 92,466 potholes across five years. A good rating makes generic "the roads are terrible" arguments useless. Specificity wins.
1,191 Kilometres — Mostly Estate Roads
Network size from Rotherham's own transparency report — where pothole claims actually happen
| Road class | Length | Share of network |
|---|---|---|
| A roads (principal) | 136.7 km | 11.5% |
| B & C roads (non-principal) | 279.3 km | 23.4% |
| Unclassified (U roads) | 775.0 km | 65.1% |
| Total carriageway | 1,191.0 km | 100% |
| Footways | 1,666.4 km | — |
A £1.93 Billion Asset
Rotherham calculates gross replacement cost at over £1.93 billion — the largest financial asset the council manages. Their Highway Asset Management Plan, Code of Practice for Highway Inspection and Assessment, and certified National Register of Highway Inspectors underpin the best-practice GREEN scorecard.
Targets Beaten — April 2025
Council plan targets vs actual green-condition share: Principal roads target 72%, actual 81.05%; non-principal target 66%, actual 78.46%; unclassified target 60%, actual 66.98%.
Five Years of Condition Data
RED / amber / green percentages from Rotherham's transparency report — SCANNER on classified roads, coarse visual inspection on unclassified
A-roads (136.7km — SCANNER, two-year cycle): stable but RED edging up
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | 1.84% | 17.16% | 81.00% |
| 2022/23 | 2.41% | 18.22% | 79.37% |
| 2024/25 | 2.67% | 16.28% | 81.05% |
A-road green share recovered to 81.05%, but RED condition has risen 45% since 2020/21 (1.84% → 2.67%). At 136.7km, that is still a small absolute area — but the trend matters if your claim is on a principal route.
B and C roads (279.3km — SCANNER, two-year cycle): recovered from 2021/22 dip
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | 2.49% | 18.89% | 78.62% |
| 2021/22 | 3.28% | 21.45% | 75.28% |
| 2023/24 | 2.34% | 19.11% | 78.55% |
| 2024/25 | 2.56% | 18.98% | 78.46% |
B&C green condition sits at 78.46% — well above the council's 66% target and the DfT's ~62% national average. Roughly one in five B/C roads is amber — maintenance may be required soon.
Unclassified roads (775km — CVI, four-year cycle): the turnaround story
| Year | Red | Amber | Green |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | 18.89% | 26.02% | 55.09% |
| 2022/23 | 14.28% | 21.51% | 64.21% |
| 2023/24 | 12.69% | 23.10% | 64.21% |
| 2024/25 | 10.93% | 22.09% | 66.98% |
RED share on estate roads nearly halved in five years (18.89% → 10.93%). The council also reports the unclassified network peaked at 24% in 2015 before capital investment began. But 10.93% RED on 775km still means substantial estate-road mileage in poor condition — and 22.09% amber means maintenance may be required soon on a further 171km.
The Four-Year Estate-Road Survey Cycle
How Rotherham inspects the 65% of its network where most pothole claims originate
"Rotherham Council collects condition data of 100% our Unclassified Road Network (Estate Type Roads) through Coarse Visual Inspections over a 4-year cycle. The Coarse Visual Inspection (CVI) is usually carried out on foot and allows 25% (or a return period of once every four years) of the Unclassified Network (approximately 195km) to be assessed each year."
— Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
Safety Inspections vs Condition Surveys
Rotherham runs safety highway inspections under its Code of Practice — certified inspectors on the National Register of Highway Inspectors, recording defects that present immediate danger. That is separate from the four-year CVI condition survey covering 100% of U-roads on a rolling 25% per year basis.
Section 58 turns on the specific defect and the council's inspection regime for that road — not on whether the borough beat its green-condition targets.
PAS 2161 From 2026/27
The council notes that from 2026/27, road condition will be assessed under BSI PAS 2161 — five categories instead of three. Today's RED/amber/green percentages may not be directly comparable with post-2026 data. Build your claim on contemporaneous inspection records and defect criteria, not scorecard colours alone.
Section 58 Questions For Estate Roads
Under Section 58 of the Highways Act 1980, Rotherham must show reasonable maintenance of the specific highway where you were damaged — not just that the borough is all-GREEN. Ask:
- • When was your road last coarse-visually inspected — year one, two, three, or four of the cycle?
- • Did the pothole meet the council's Code of Practice intervention criteria for depth and width?
- • Was it reported before your incident — FixMyStreet, council online forms, ward member referral?
- • Was it on a section with repetitive reactive repairs flagged in the prioritisation matrix?
- • If 10.93% of U-roads were RED at the last survey, what was done about defects on yours?
A council cannot rely on network-level GREEN ratings to defeat a claim about a specific, reportable defect it failed to repair within its own Code of Practice timeframes.
92,466 Estimated Pothole Repairs in Five Years
Reactive repair volumes from the council's transparency report — the counterweight to a GREEN rating
| Year | Estimated potholes filled | Km of road repaired |
|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | 19,585 | 79.68 |
| 2021/22 | 20,021 | 78.63 |
| 2022/23 | 16,758 | 60.87 |
| 2023/24 | 20,166 | 50.36 |
| 2024/25 | 15,936 | 49.00 |
| Five-year total | 92,466 | 318.54 |
~51 Repairs a Day, Every Day
Averaged over five years, Rotherham fills an estimated 51 potholes per day. Planned km repaired has fallen from 79.68km (2020/21) to 49km (2024/25) as the council shifts toward surface treatments and timely intervention — but reactive volume remains high. Defects still form between inspections.
The Council's Own Framing
"Balancing repairs across the different highway conditions helps to provide more control of the need for 'reactive / pothole' repairs. Safety is always our priority, and dangerous defects are always given a high priority."
— Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
Following the Money
Rotherham supplements DfT grants with substantial council capital — and keeps reactive spend below 11%
| Year | DfT allocation | Council capital | Revenue | Preventative % | Reactive % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | £4.0m CRSTS + £2.3m Pothole Fund | £6.0m | £749.61k | 93.91% | 6.09% |
| 2022/23 | £4.0m CRSTS | £6.0m | £673.30k | 93.27% | 6.73% |
| 2024/25 | £4.0m CRSTS + £1.1m NNRRF | £3.0m CW + £1.2m FW | £964.69k | 89.63% | 10.37% |
| 2025/26 (projected) | £4.0m CRSTS + £1.961m LHMF | £3.0m CW + £1.2m FW | £952.25k | 90.63% | 9.37% |
£51m+ Into Estate Roads Since 2015
£5m (two years) + £10m (three years) + £24m (four years from 2020/21) + £12m (four years from 2024/25) in dedicated unclassified-network capital. The council reports this arrested deterioration and cut RED condition from a 2015 peak of 24% to 11% in March 2025.
2025/26 Programme
Planned repairs to over 187 roads (~48km), 95 footways (~23km), and 35 pairs of tactile dropped crossings — via surface dressing, micro asphalt, resurfacing, and constructional repair.
What Rotherham's Report Acknowledges
Verbatim from the 2025 Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report
"Investment, Collaborative working and good Asset management principles has seen an improvement in the condition of the Unclassified Network from its peak at 24% in 2015 to 11% in March 2025. (Lower being better)."
— Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
"Through timely intervention and good asset management principles, Rotherham Council have moved away from 'worst first' planning to using resources to stem the decline of assets in better condition whilst maintaining the condition of the poorest condition assets."
— Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
"The Council committed to invest into the Unclassified Road Network in the 2015/2026 financial year with £5m over a two-year period, this Investment arrested the deterioration during this period. A further investment of £10m over three years followed by £24m over four years enabled the Highway Asset team, through good asset management principles, improve the condition by nearly 50% of its peak in 2015."
— Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025
Claiming Against an All-GREEN Council
Honest assessment: Rotherham is not Derbyshire — here is how that changes your approach
What Works In The Council's Favour
- ✓ All four DfT scorecards GREEN — among England's best-rated authorities
- ✓ 89–94% preventative spend across five published years
- ✓ U-road RED share nearly halved since 2020/21 (18.89% → 10.93%)
- ✓ Certified highway inspectors, documented Code of Practice, HAMP-aligned asset management
- ✓ £51m+ capital invested in estate roads since 2015
Expect a well-documented Section 58 defence. Generic "council neglect" arguments will fail.
What Works In Yours
- ✗ 15,936 estimated pothole repairs in 2024/25 — defects still form daily
- ✗ 10.93% of 775km U-roads still RED — plus 22.09% amber
- ✗ U-road condition surveys on a four-year CVI cycle (25% per year)
- ✗ A-road RED condition up 45% since 2020/21 (1.84% → 2.67%)
- ✗ Prioritisation weighs ward member nominations and customer reports — proof of prior reporting matters
The Winning Strategy Is Specificity
Against a council with all-GREEN scorecards and 90%+ preventative spend, your claim lives or dies on the specific defect under Section 41 and Section 58:
- • Prior reports of the same pothole — proof of actual or constructive notice
- • Photos showing defect size, depth, and visible age (weathered edges, previous patching)
- • Whether the pothole met the council's Code of Practice intervention criteria
- • Road class — on a U-road, the four-year CVI survey cycle and 10.93% RED share are structural context
- • Repetitive reactive repairs on the same section — flagged in the council's own prioritisation matrix
Mac builds exactly this case: prior-report search, photo assessment, and Rotherham's own transparency data cited where it helps — without pretending an all-GREEN council is the same as a failing one.
Hit a Pothole in Rotherham?
An all-GREEN council demands a precise claim. £35 for a professional claim pack.
DIY Claim
- • Submit photos and invoices
- • Use generic template letter
- • Ignore all-GREEN Section 58 strength
- • No four-year CVI cycle argument
- • No prior-report search
Professional Claim Pack
- ✅ All-GREEN rating acknowledged honestly
- ✅ 92,466 five-year pothole total cited
- ✅ U-road four-year survey cycle argued
- ✅ Prior reports searched and attached
- ✅ Section 58 rebuttal tailored to Rotherham
No percentage fees. You keep 100% of any compensation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Rotherham's all-GREEN DfT rating block my pothole claim?
No — but it changes your approach. Rotherham is one of the few councils in England rated GREEN on all four DfT scorecards, which strengthens their Section 58 defence at network level. Your claim still turns on the specific defect: whether it met their intervention criteria, whether it was found in a safety inspection, and whether it was repaired within their Code of Practice timeframes — not on the colour of a borough-wide scorecard.
What does all-GREEN actually mean for Rotherham?
GREEN means Rotherham performs above the DfT threshold on overall condition, spend, and best practice — A-roads at 85.5% good and B&C roads at 86.5% good versus national averages of roughly 69% and 62%. It does not mean zero potholes: the council filled an estimated 15,936 in 2024/25 alone, and roughly 11% of its 775km unclassified network was still in RED condition in March 2025.
Rotherham still repairs 15,000+ potholes a year — can I still claim?
Yes. Reactive repairs are evidence that defects form on this network regardless of a GREEN rating. Rotherham's own transparency report shows 92,466 estimated pothole repairs across five years (2020/21–2024/25). A council filling potholes daily is a council where individual defects can still damage vehicles between inspections — especially if yours was reportable and left unrepaired.
What if my pothole was on an estate or unclassified road?
Unclassified roads make up 775km — 65% of Rotherham's 1,191km carriageway network. Condition here has improved markedly (RED share fell from 18.89% in 2020/21 to 10.93% in 2024/25), but the council only coarse-visually inspects 25% of U-roads each year — roughly 195km on a four-year return cycle. Section 58 turns on whether your specific road was inspected and whether the defect should have been caught, not on borough-wide improvement trends.
How does Section 58 apply to one of England's best-rated councils?
Section 58 of the Highways Act 1980 lets a council defend a claim if it proves reasonable maintenance of the specific highway. Rotherham's GREEN ratings, 90%+ preventative spend, and ISO-aligned asset management make that defence stronger than most. But Section 41 still imposes a duty to maintain — and their own data shows thousands of reactive repairs, A-road RED condition edging up, and U-roads surveyed on a four-year CVI cycle. Prior reports, photos showing defect age, and proof the pothole met their intervention criteria remain your strongest tools.
Data sources: Department for Transport — Local Road Maintenance Ratings 2025 to 2026 | Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report 2025. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Reusable evidence record
Council rating evidence and provenance
Rating period: 2025-2026 · Reviewed 19 July 2026
Observed DfT fact
Overall GREEN; condition GREEN; spend GREEN; best practice GREEN.
Cautious interpretation
This is network-level context. The rating does not determine liability for a particular incident or establish what was known about a specific defect.
Correction status: No correction recorded.