Source
Department for Transport — Local road maintenance ratings 2025 to 2026
amberOverall|red Conditiongreen Spendamber Best Practice
Wandsworth: 372km of U-Roads on 2021 Survey Data
Wandsworth earns GREEN for spend — projecting £10.25m in capital works against a £655,000 DfT allocation. Yet the DfT awards RED for condition, notes ratings are based on incomplete road condition data, and the council's last borough-wide Detailed Visual Inspection — from 2021/22 — flagged 36% of A-roads and 56% of classified roads for resurfacing-level intervention on a network where 372.18km is unclassified.
372km
Unclassified roads — 91% of the carriageway network
Wandsworth's June 2025 transparency report lists 372.18km of U-roads against just 21.76km of A-roads and 15.26km of B and C roads. The last published intervention-rate survey for this overwhelmingly residential network dates from 2021/22 — four years before this report.
A 409km Network — DfT RED Condition, Incomplete Data
Wandsworth Borough Council's own highway inventory from Annex A (June 2025), set against DfT 2025/26 scorecards
amber
Overall — AMBER
red
Condition — RED
green
Spend — GREEN
amber
Best practice — AMBER
The Department for Transport notes that Wandsworth's overall, condition and best-practice scorecards are based on incomplete road condition data, which has affected these ratings. That is the government's own caveat — not our characterisation — and it sits alongside a RED condition scorecard.
| Classification | Length (km approx.) | Share of network |
|---|---|---|
| A roads | 21.76 | 5.3% |
| B and C roads | 15.26 | 3.7% |
| Unclassified roads | 372.18 | 90.9% |
| Footways | 834.28 | — |
| Cycleways | 3.89* | *Provisional |
Wandsworth maintains approximately 440km of roads in total — council responsibility is approximately 93%, TfL red routes approximately 7%. Gross replacement cost for carriageways alone is £692,693,000; total maintenance spend in 2025/26 represents 0.15% of current carriageway and footway asset value per Annex B.
What The Condition Data Shows
The last Detailed Visual Inspection was in 2021/22 — supplemented by DfT single-data-list submissions in Annex B (October 2025)
2021/22 DVI — roads requiring intervention (resurfacing-level defects)
| Road class | Network length | Requiring intervention | Approx. km affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| A roads | 21.76 km | 36% | ~7.8 km |
| B roads (within classified total) | — | 20% | — |
| All classified (A and B roads combined) | 37.02 km | 56% | ~20.7 km |
| Unclassified roads | 372.18 km | 17% | ~63.3 km |
| Pavements / footways | 834.28 km | 31% | ~258.6 km |
These figures measure defects requiring intervention such as resurfacing — not the same RED/Amber/Green categories used in Annex B's DfT data-list submissions. Wandsworth has not published an updated DVI since 2021/22 in this report. Approximate km affected derived from published percentages × network length where both are available.
Annex B — DfT single data list (where maintenance should be considered)
130-01 Principal roads
8.4%
Red
36.1%
Amber
130-02 Non-principal classified roads
6.88%
Red
25.23%
Amber
130-03 Skidding resistance
28.4%
Red
71.6%
Green
No equivalent 130-series RAG breakdown for unclassified roads appears in Annex B — despite U-roads being 90.9% of the carriageway network. Combined, 44.5% of principal roads and 32.11% of non-principal classified roads are in RED or amber condition where maintenance should be considered.
Why This Matters For Section 58
To rely on the Section 58 defence, Wandsworth must show it had a reasonable system for knowing the condition of its roads. Ask:
- • When was your road last condition-surveyed — and was it before or after 2021/22?
- • If 17% of U-roads already needed intervention at the last survey, what was done about yours?
- • Why has no updated DVI been published if AI surveys are still being trialled for 2026/27?
- • Does the dangerous-pothole KPI cover your defect, or only defects reported through Brightly Confirm?
- • How does the DfT's incomplete-data flag align with a blanket Section 58 defence?
A council cannot claim detailed network knowledge from a four-year-old survey while the DfT rates its condition data incomplete and awards RED for condition.
The Managed Decline Admission
Wandsworth's own explanation for why condition lags investment — in its own words
"The Council highway asset, like many other Highway Authorities' highway asset, has been in a managed decline position for a number of years. There has been a sustained challenges in highway maintenance investment going back many years with an ever-increasing gap between asset needs and available budgets."
— Wandsworth Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report — Annex A (June 2025)
"The modelling showed significant additional investment is required to improve Network Performance."
— Wandsworth Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report — Annex A (June 2025), citing Causeway Asset Management Consultant modelling in 2024/25
What this admission means
Wandsworth formally acknowledges its highway asset has been in managed decline — accepting deterioration rather than keeping pace with need. The council also states that once a road reaches a bad enough condition, "more expensive structural repairs, complete replacement or even closure are likely to follow."
When a council documents managed decline and an investment gap, it raises questions about whether reactive pothole patching satisfies the Section 41 duty for your specific road.
The investment response
The council's additional investment increased from £4.75m to £8m in 2024/25 and to £10.25m per annum in future years — which the report states would "both stop the trend of continual annual decline in the network condition and enable significant improvements over time."
That is a plan — not proof your road was maintained before your incident. Forward spend does not retroactively fix a four-year-old condition survey.
GREEN Spend, RED Condition
Five years of Wandsworth's own spending data — and the sharp 2024/25 to 2025/26 uplift
| Year | DfT capital (£000s) | Capital spend (£m) | Revenue spend (£m) | Preventative | Reactive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | £0 | £3.50 | £1.10 | 68.57% | 31.42% |
| 2023/24 | £202 | £4.75 | £1.20 | 74.73% | 25.26% |
| 2024/25 | £202 | £8.00 | £1.30 | 83.75% | 16.25% |
| 2025/26 (proj.) | £655 | £10.25 | £1.40 | 86.34% | 13.66% |
More Than Fifteen Times The DfT Allocation
£655k
DfT capital allocation 2025/26
£10.25m
Projected capital spend 2025/26
86.34%
Estimated preventative share
Wandsworth plans to spend more than fifteen times its DfT allocation — yet the DfT still rates condition RED and flags incomplete condition data. Revenue funding is "spent on reactive maintenance such as potholes and defective paving repairs" while capital funds resurfacing and reconstruction.
2025/26 DfT-funded programme
The council's £655,000 DfT allocation in 2025/26 is allocated to specific schemes including:
- • Queenstown Road (A3216) Phase 2 — Queen's Circus to Sopwith Way
- • Balham Park Road — St James's Drive to O/S No. 71
- • Putney Hill (A219) Phase 2 — Lytton Grove to Wildcroft Road
- • Garratt Lane (A217) Phase 2 footway renewal — Allfarthing Lane to Magdalen Road
If your pothole was not on a listed scheme, the council may still argue routine inspection — but the programme shows where DfT money is actually going.
Council marketing vs DfT ratings
Wandsworth's transparency web page states the borough is running "the biggest resurfacing programme of any borough in London" in 2025/26, with the largest portion council-funded.
That is the council's own characterisation. The DfT's independent scorecard — with its incomplete-data caveat — tells a more cautious story about whether the network condition picture supports a strong Section 58 defence on your specific road.
Shared Services, TfL Gaps and Inspection KPIs
How Wandsworth maintains its network — and what the council documents about funding shortfalls
"Wandsworth and Richmond-upon-Thames operate a Shared Service Arrangement for all Highway Maintenance functions, so the performance of each borough is directly compared."
— Wandsworth Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report — Annex B (October 2025)
"TfL funding for the BPRN continues to fall short of what is needed, which has had a negative effect on the condition of the Borough's A roads."
— Wandsworth Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report — Annex A (June 2025)
TfL BPRN funding history
Wandsworth previously received an annual TfL grant for the Borough Principal Road Network until 2018/19. TfL funding has been "considerably reduced" and is now limited to a central amount boroughs must bid for competitively.
- • No BPRN funding: 2019/20, 2020/21, 2022/23, 2024/25
- • £200,000 secured: 2021/22, 2023/24, 2025/26
With 36% of A-roads flagged for intervention at the last DVI and 8.4% in RED on the DfT data list, the council documents underfunding of its most trafficked routes.
Inspection and response KPIs (Q1–Q2 2025/26)
100%
WECSHOS-002: dangerous highway defects attended within 24 hours
100%
WECSHOS-004: dangerous potholes fixed within 7 days
2026/27
PAS 2161 methodology due — AI surveys still being trialled
Public enquiries and defect reports are logged on the Brightly Confirm Customer Services Module. "The numbers of Carriageway or Footway Defects is one of Factors that are included" in maintenance programme selection. As part of the Pride in Our Streets programme, the council launched its 7 rings, 7 days guarantee for dangerous potholes.
Prior reports through Brightly Confirm, FixMyStreet or the council's online form are direct evidence of notice — especially where the council's own KPIs apply only to defects classified as dangerous.
Claiming Against a RED-Condition, GREEN-Spend Borough
Honest assessment: Wandsworth is investing heavily — but condition data tells a different story
What works in the council's favour
- ✓ GREEN spend scorecard — capital projected at £10.25m against £655k DfT allocation
- ✓ Preventative share rising to 86.34% in 2025/26
- ✓ 100% dangerous-defect and dangerous-pothole KPIs in Q1–Q2 2025/26
- ✓ FM Conway contract, UKPMS DVI surveys and published annual maintenance programme
- ✓ LoTAG/LoHEG benchmarking and shared-service performance comparison with Richmond
Expect a documented Section 58 defence citing inspection regimes and response KPIs. Generic claims will struggle.
What works in yours
- ✗ RED condition scorecard — DfT flags incomplete road condition data
- ✗ Last network DVI from 2021/22 — 56% of classified roads flagged for intervention
- ✗ Council admits "managed decline" and an ever-increasing investment gap
- ✗ 372km of U-roads with no Annex B RAG breakdown — 17% needed intervention at last survey
- ✗ TfL A-road funding "falls short" — 36% of A-roads needed intervention at last DVI
- ✗ Dangerous-pothole KPI applies only to defects over 40mm — not every claim-level pothole
The winning strategy here is specificity
Against a borough with GREEN spend and 100% dangerous-pothole KPIs, your claim lives or dies on the specific defect:
- • Prior reports of the same pothole (Brightly Confirm, FixMyStreet, council reports) — proof of actual notice
- • Photos showing the defect's size, depth and visible age (weathered edges, previous patching)
- • The road's class — on a U-road, the 2021/22 survey gap and 17% intervention rate are structural arguments
- • Whether your street was on the 2025/26 DfT-funded programme list or outside the pipeline
- • Whether the defect met the council's 40mm dangerous threshold — and if not, why it was left untreated
Mac builds exactly this case: he searches for prior reports, assesses your photo evidence, and cites Wandsworth's own transparency data — including managed decline and the DfT incomplete-data caveat — where they help you.
Report a pothole in Wandsworth
Reporting the defect creates a council record — useful evidence whether or not you claim
Council reporting channels
Wandsworth states that any defect reported will be inspected and, if appropriate, programmed for repair. Dangerous potholes — judged as a difference of level or trip of over 40mm — fall under the 7 rings, 7 days guarantee.
- Report a pothole online — name, location and description required
- 7 rings, 7 days guarantee — dangerous defect threshold and WhatsApp reporting
- Report a street problem — broader defects including footways
Red routes — report to TfL
Wandsworth maintains approximately 93% of borough roads. Defects on Transport for London red routes — approximately 7% of the network — must be reported to TfL, not the borough council.
If you are claiming for damage, confirm the highway authority first. A pothole on a Wandsworth borough road supports a claim against Wandsworth Borough Council; a red-route defect goes to TfL.
Defect reports logged through Brightly Confirm feed into maintenance prioritisation. A dated report with photos is stronger evidence than an undocumented pothole the council can say it never knew about.
Hit a Pothole in Wandsworth?
A well-funded borough with RED condition data demands a precise claim. £35 for a professional claim pack.
DIY claim
- • Submit photos and invoices
- • Use generic template letter
- • No 2021/22 survey-gap argument
- • No prior-report search
- • No DfT incomplete-data citation
Professional claim pack
- ✅ 372km U-road network and stale survey documented
- ✅ RED condition / incomplete data argued
- ✅ Managed decline admission cited
- ✅ Prior reports searched and attached
- ✅ Section 58 rebuttal tailored to Wandsworth
No percentage fees. You keep 100% of any compensation.
Frequently asked questions
Wandsworth has GREEN spend and is tripling capital investment — can I still claim?
Yes. The DfT Spend scorecard is GREEN because Wandsworth projects £10.25m capital spend against a £655,000 DfT allocation in 2025/26, with preventative maintenance estimated at 86.34%. But the Condition scorecard is RED — the DfT flags Wandsworth's ratings as based on incomplete road condition data — and the council's last published network DVI dates from 2021/22. Section 58 turns on whether the specific defect that damaged your vehicle was reasonably inspected and repaired, not on forward spend alone.
What if my pothole was on a residential or unclassified road?
U-roads make up 372.18km — roughly 91% of Wandsworth's 409.2km adopted carriageway network. The council's last Detailed Visual Inspection in 2021/22 found 17% of unclassified roads had defects requiring intervention such as resurfacing — about 63km of residential streets. Annex B submits RAG percentages to the DfT for principal and non-principal classified roads only; no equivalent 130-series breakdown for U-roads appears in the published report.
Why does the DfT rate Wandsworth's condition RED when the council says it has London's biggest resurfacing programme?
The DfT notes that Wandsworth's overall, condition and best-practice scorecards are based on incomplete road condition data. The transparency report cites only a 2021/22 DVI for borough-wide intervention percentages and admits the highway asset has been in "managed decline" for years. Capital spend is projected to rise from £4.75m to £10.25m — but that is forward investment against a condition picture the council has not fully re-surveyed since 2021/22.
Does Wandsworth sharing highway services with Richmond affect my claim?
Wandsworth and Richmond upon Thames operate a Shared Service Arrangement for all highway maintenance functions, with performance directly compared between boroughs. Liability for your claim still rests with Wandsworth Borough Council as the highway authority for roads in this borough. The shared-service model means Wandsworth may invoke Richmond-benchmarked processes under Section 58 — but you should still challenge whether those systems caught your specific defect.
Wandsworth fixes 100% of dangerous potholes within seven days — does that block my claim?
It helps the council only if they can prove your defect was classified as dangerous — over 40mm deep under the council's published threshold — notified through Brightly Confirm or another logged channel, and repaired within seven days before your incident. KPI WECSHOS-004 showed 100% in Q1 and Q2 of 2025/26. Prior reports, photos showing defect age, and proof the pothole predated any inspection all matter when a council points to response-time KPIs.
My pothole was on a red route — is that still Wandsworth?
No. Wandsworth maintains approximately 93% of the borough's highway network; Transport for London maintains the remaining approximately 7% as red routes. Both the council's report-a-pothole page and its 7 rings, 7 days guarantee direct residents to report defects on red routes to TfL, not the borough. Check the road classification before you claim.
Does the managed decline admission help my claim?
It can. Wandsworth's June 2025 report states its highway asset "has been in a managed decline position for a number of years" and that there is "an ever-increasing gap between asset needs and available budgets." Causeway Asset Management modelling in 2024/25 showed "significant additional investment is required to improve Network Performance." When a council documents managed decline and a funding gap, it raises questions about whether reactive pothole patching satisfies the Section 41 duty for your specific road.
Data sources: Department for Transport — Local Road Maintenance Ratings 2025 to 2026 | Wandsworth Borough Council Local Highways Maintenance Transparency Report (June & October 2025) | Annex A (June 2025) | Annex B (October 2025). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Reusable evidence record
Council rating evidence and provenance
Rating period: 2025-2026 · Reviewed 19 July 2026
Observed DfT fact
Overall AMBER; condition RED; spend GREEN; best practice AMBER.
Cautious interpretation
This is network-level context. The rating does not determine liability for a particular incident or establish what was known about a specific defect.
Correction status: No correction recorded.